If you read the above article, hasn’t it pretty much always been this way?
So what constitues a ‘hacker’? Is it the ability to program? Is it just having a basic enough understanding of the terminal to throw commands at linux? Is having kali enough to be arrested nowadays?
I live across the street from some pretty sharp CS majors and I have to scan my wireless a lot. I live in a small 4 unit building and supply internet to the other 3 tenants, so needless to say I don’t want 10 other people on there as well. So I use a few tools to keep things safe and routinely look for entry points. I’m breaking into my own network.
So from the point of view of my neighbors, since I provide internet to them and defend it as much as I can, just having the idea that I can slip into their computers and have a look – can they bring legal action against me? We’re all friends, but who’s to say one of them gets mad and calls the cops saying I broke into their computer? No evidence of intrusion exists.
Maybe the evidence would be the tools I keep on the computers. Maybe I should delete them and hide my head in the sand and just trust that no one will jump on our wifi again.
Maybe we should all stay inside, lock the doors, and hope nothing ever happens.
How about this, if only there were a freely distributed version of linux that has pen testing already built in? What if it’s so easy you don’t have to really know what’s up? What if we just give it to a whole bunch of people, in which case everyone will have at least some basic defense with the option of learning how to protect yourself.
Oh, this has been around?
So everyone’s a hacker I guess. Hey, if you have terminal on your computer then you’re a hacker.
Didn’t even know it did ya?
If I’m off base, feel free to correct me. I’m no activist, just observing.